A Simulation Study to Compare Two Bootstrapping Methods for Propensity-score Matching

Photo by ChatGPT

In this project, I generated 15 scenarios of epidemiological confounding data with weak, medium, and strong confounding relationships between covariates and continuous & binary outcomes. I randomly generated 1000 datasets for each scenario to calculate the true effect and variance. I conducted the propensity score matching method via both complex and simple bootstrap to calculate and compare the variability of the average treatment effects with true variance.

刘宗超
刘宗超
Ph.D student in epidmeiology and biostatistics

My research interests include biostatistics, cancer epidemiology, health data science, and computational biology. Currently, I mainly focus on gastric cancer-related topics.